Ideas about rolling

Ideas about rolling

Pencil and paperOnline interactive
Overview
Using this Resource
Connecting to the Curriculum
Marking Student Responses
Working with Students
Further Resources
This task is about explaining your ideas about rolling cars.
 

Question

a)  Do you think the 4 wheel drive or the fire engine will go further when they roll down the ramps?
    • 4-wheel drive

    • fire engine

b) Why do you think that?
Task administration: 
This task can be completed with pencil and paper or online.
  • For many students at Level 2 you are likely to get much more evidence of their thinking if this task is carried out orally. Use prompts (e.g., Can you tell me more about that?), but don't ask leading questions.
  • If you want to document their explanations, you can record their responses for them.
  • An alternative way of carrying out this task is to use the question as a starter for a class or group discussion. All the different ideas and explanations can be recorded on the whiteboard. This helps to promote the nature of science idea that there may be a number of explanations for why one car may go further than another. It also helps students to build on and respond critically to each others' ideas.
Level:
2
Description of task: 
Choose which toy vehicle will roll further, and explain why. The two vehicles are set up under different conditions (ramps at different slopes, rolling onto different surfaces at the bottom). Assessment focus: science explanations using ideas about forces and energy.
Curriculum Links: 
Science capabilities
The capabilities focus is brought about by the conversations you have and the questions you ask.
 
Capability: Gather and interpret data
This resource provides opportunities to discuss sometimes predicting can be about imagining what might happen.
Science capabilities: 
Answers/responses: 
a) i) Accept either the 4-wheel drive or the fire engine (the point of the question is not to see if they give the "correct" answer, but to provide a starting point for the student to discuss their ideas).
  ii) Look for explanations that include reference to any of

  • The slope of the ramps
  • The floor surfaces
  • The type of vehicle (including the number of wheels, condition of tyres, aerodynamics of shape, weight, size, etc.)

NOTE: This task was adapted from a task that was trialled at Years 4, 6, 8, and 10. In its original form it was too difficult for many Year 4 students. This version is a more open-ended question that allows students to attend to the aspects they notice or think are important. To see the original task and the performance data go to Ideas about forces and energy.

Teaching and learning: 

Background information
This resource focuses on students explaining their ideas. A key feature of science explanations is the focus on improving current explanations as we gather more evidence. The task asks students to identify what they currently believe, and why, and this opens up the space to debate, challenge, check, adapt, and build on their explanations. The motion of objects is an every day experience for students, but the science of motion is complex. Playing with toy cars is an engaging context to start building explanations about motion, based on their observations.

Nature of science idea Science knowledge
Understanding about science
There may be more than one explanation for what makes a toy car go further.
Physical concepts
Forces (pushes and pulls) affect how far objects move.

This task also has links to Investigating in science. Although students are not asked to identify variables, the different things that students may identify are in fact variables that they might control during a fair test. Fair testing is quite a difficult concept for Level 2 students, but if you want to do some further work on this aspect, Rolling marbles, is a suitable resource to use.

Diagnostic and formative information: 
Nature of Science: explanations

Diagnostic and formative information
In the original trials, even when they could identify a variable that affected how far the toys would travel, few students at Year 4 wrote a sensible explanation. Some examples of responses from the original task, both with and without an explanation, are shown in the table below.

Identify a variable only

Identify a variable only

Give an explanation

Describe the property of the surface (bumpy/smooth).

  • It is too lumpy.
Link properties of surface to slowing down the vehicles.

  • Because the soft carpet will make the car go slower
Describe aspects of the car (shape, size, weight, number of tyres, etc.).

  • Because the one on the right has a square front instead of round
Link to science concepts, e.g., aerodynamics, increased friction, or momentum.

  • Ones lower to the ground are better because the wind won't affect the car so much.
Steepness of the ramp (given) Link to science concepts (energy or forces) and/or everyday observations.

  • Because it goes down faster it can gather more speed so it goes further.
  • It's just the wheels can't move on flat surfaces.
  • Because one of the cars is higher up

  

Science concepts: forces and energy

NOTE: The data are from the original trialled task Ideas about forces and energy.

Students at this level were most likely to write explanations using intuitive ideas based on previous experiences and observations rather than science concepts, and this is appropriate at this age. Some are beginning to use scientific vocabulary, but have an unscientific understanding of the word. Some examples are:

  • Because the carpet is bumpy so it has a reaction and it stops.
  • Because the carpet will have hairs sticking out all over the place which will slow down the force.
  • If it goes too steep it will flip at the bottom.
  • Because the higher the car is the further it will go. It will happen as the force of height slows it down.
  • The slope will make it easier for the car to come down.
  • It is a flat surface so it can't go unless you push it.
  • If they are on a slope it goes down but when there is a flat surface the car doesn't go anywhere.


Next steps
Students need lots of experiences observing what happens in different circumstances. The focus at this level should, for most students, be building up these experiences, and using their personal theories to develop simple explanations using their terminology rather than worrying too much about abstract ideas about forces. Ask questions that encourage them to think further about what they have noticed and what they might want to try out next.

Get students to test their predictions. At this level they are likely to need support to include fair testing principles. Isolate each variable students suggest and help them plan a test. The table below provides some examples. (Different groups could do different tests according to their initial ideas.)

Refer also to Further Resources, especially Figure it Out: Forces.

Variable What will we keep the same? What will be different?
Slope of the ramps

The toy car
The floor surface

The ramp slope (different steepness)
Floor surface

The toy car
The slope of the ramp

The floor surface (smooth and rough)
The shape of the car

The floor surface
The slope of the ramp

Toy cars (different shapes, e.g., a fire engine and a 4 wheel drive)

Students could then use their results to provide evidence that their predictions were correct or not. Encourage them to extend their explanations to identifying not just the variable (for example, the floor surface), but also why that has an effect (e.g., the bumps in the carpet slow the car down, a steeper slope makes a car go down faster so it takes longer to slow down and goes further). When they are doing this they are starting to use their science understandings, even if these are based only on what they have noticed, to support their explanations.

Next steps

Class and/or group discussions are a good way to develop skills in developing explanations. Give students practice in backing up their predictions with reasons, initially orally. A structure that scaffolds them to do this can be helpful, e.g. I think ……… because ………
Once they are used to doing this during discussions they can then be encouraged to record their explanations in written form. Predict, Observe Explain (POE) is another more structured strategy to encourage students to explain their ideas. It could be used to attend more closely to the variables. Examples of questions that would be suitable for a POE are:

  • Will a toy car go further on wood or carpet?
  • Will the four wheel drive or the fire engine go further?
  • Will a toy car go further on a steep or flatter ramp?

If more appropriate for your students, their ideas could be gathered orally. Encourage students to critique and build on others' explanations, again providing reasons for their ideas. Possible teaching points to focus on include:

  • Do students consider other information as it becomes available and revise their explanation?
  • Do students ask questions for clarification?

To find other ARB resources about explanations use the keyword explanations.

To find other ARB resources about forces select Physical World and use the keywords forces AND friction.

Resources for supporting students to develop explanations:

Text connectives - scroll down to the heading.

  • Bull, A., Hipkins, R., Joyce, C. & MacIntyre, B. (2007). The Water Cycle: A Science Journey. Teacher's Notes. Wellington: NZCER Press. This resource, one of the Kick Starts, has a small section on page 18 and 20 about teaching the language of explanation.
  • Hipkins, R., Roberts, J. & Bolstad, R. (2007). Key Competencies: The Journey Begins. Wellington: NZCER Press. The two posters Words that help us think, that are part of this resource, were designed to support students to extend their ability to explain their ideas.
  • Ministry of Education (1999). Making Better Sense of the Physical World. Refer to the section, Force and Motion.
  • Ministry of Education (2003). Building Science Concepts Book 42, Marbles. Wellington: Learning Media. This book is aimed at Levels 3 and 4 but some of the activities could be adapted for younger students, or used to extend some students. The teachers' notes are useful for helping teachers with their own science understandings.
  • Ministry of Education (2010). Figure It Out. Forces. Mathematics in science contexts. Wellington: Learning Media. Zoom, zoom (pages 19-21) addresses the same context, and provides ideas for relevant investigations and support for recording results.

Other useful resources:

Rolling marbles scaffolds students to plan a simple fair test in the context of rolling marbles. This could be adapted to investigate rolling cars. 
Rolling marbles II  includes a useful strategy for measuring the distance marbles travel that enables students to see the pattern that eventuates. This could be adapted to investigate rolling cars. 
POE provides a full description of this strategy.