Burning candle diagram
Y10 (09/2007) | |
Drawings included representation of particles | very difficult |
NOTE: Level 4 in the new curriculum states that students will "begin to develop an understanding of the particle nature of matter and use this to explain observed changes".
Asking students to represent particles by drawing gives teachers opportunities to assess both students' knowledge about the particle nature of matter and their ability to communicate science ideas (Nature of science strand).
In this task, students were specifically asked to think about what they would see happening when a candle burns if they were able to see the molecules of wax. Most students indicated that they knew something about the changes that occur when a candle burns but did not attempt to show changes happening at this "micro-level". Instead, they drew the changes you would directly observe if you were watching a candle burn.
Only 41 students out of the sample of 294 students represented molecules in their drawings. Of those that did, twenty six students showed they knew something about how the behaviour of molecules changed when material changed state (although only six of these students' drawings included representations of gas). Only one of these students represented combustion.
Many students in the trial identified this task as difficult and almost 10% of the students made no attempt to answer this question. Several students commented that they found it difficult to express their ideas in drawings, although others said they welcomed alternative ways of showing what they knew.
Talk to the students to check whether or not they understood what the task was asking of them.
- What exactly does the task ask you to do?
- Where in the question does it ask you to think about what is happening to the molecules of wax?
- Why does it say you should add labels?
This is an opportunity to support students to develop effective strategies to ensure they are actually answering the question that is being asked. If the students did understand the task but still did not represent changes at a "micro-level" was it because they did not understand these changes or because they did not know how to represent them?
The focus of this task was on how students represented the changes at a "micro-level" when a candle burns. Approximately 70% of students in the trial did not represent changes at this level, or in fact represent molecules at all in their drawings. However, many of these students still demonstrated that they knew that wax was changing from a solid to a liquid (and back again), and some knew that the wax changed from a liquid to a gas. A few also knew that the wax in its gas form was burning. Other students showed misconceptions in their understanding about the processes involved. So, although the focus in this task is the nature of science, the task clearly shows that the content itself is still important.
The task provides opportunities to develop ideas about the conventions that are used in science when representing ideas visually. A range of students' pictures could be discussed and questions asked:
- What do the pictures show and what don't they show?
- Are there lines or arrows in the pictures? What do they represent? How do we know?
- Are there labels? Do the labels make the ideas clearer? If so, how?
Exemplars
- This Level 5 exemplar shows a student's progress in using representations to describe the nature of matter: It's elementary
On the Science Is site there are two activities that explore scientists' representations of atoms:
- Level 5-8, Models of the atom from Democritus to Rutherford
- Level 5, Selecting models of atoms
Ministry of Education (2004). Building Science Concepts, Book 64, Candles: Investigating combustion. Wellington: Learning Media.