Flowers for James
a) What things do the adults say that Charlotte misunderstands?
Page _____
Page _____
Page _____
- Give each student a copy of the text. Read the text to them or ask them to read it independently. If you read it to them, they should follow the text as you read.
- The students may do the task independently or in groups.
- The purpose of question a) is to focus the students' thinking on what Charlotte misunderstands. It will provide evidence of student ability to find evidence in the text.
- The purpose of question b) is to provide evidence of student ability to use evidence from the text, as well as their background knowledge, to evaluate the family's action of not telling Charlotte the baby has died.
- The purpose of question c) is to provide evidence of student ability to use evidence from the text, as well as their background knowledge, to make an overall evaluation of the author's construction of Charlotte. For this question, explain that a believable character is one who seems real, a credible character - someone you could believe is living, or once lived, somewhere in the world.
- For questions b) and c), tell the students that to explain their responses of Yes/ No/ Yes and No, they must support their thinking by using evidence from the text and from their prior knowledge, i.e., things that have happened to them, things they have seen, heard, or read about.
Literacy Learning Progressions (Reading)
Because this assessment task was trialled with year 7 students in the second half of the year, the most relevant progressions are: By the End of Year 6 and By the End of Year 8. The most relevant bullet points are:
- understand how they select from and use their repertoire of comprehension strategies which include:
- evaluating and integrating ideas and information across a small range of texts. [Note that in this case, students evaluate and integrate ideas within one text.]
- increasingly control a repertoire of comprehension strategies that they can use flexibly and draw on when they know they are not comprehending fully, including such strategies as:
- identifying and evaluating writers' purposes and the ways in which writers use language and ideas to suit their purposes.
This resource was trialled in August, 2010, by 23 Year 7 students from 1 decile 4 school. The story was read to the students.
Question a) What things do the adults say that Charlotte misunderstands?
Note that responses to question a) do not require students to evaluate - its purpose is to focus the students' thinking on what Charlotte misunderstands. Responses should include the following:
Page 28: '"It's too early, Jim," her mother kept saying. "It's too early."' (Charlotte thinks her mother is referring to the time of day but she is actually referring to going into early labour.)
Page 30: '"Not good," her grandmother said."' (Charlotte thinks her grandmother is talking about her behaviour, then the weather, but she is actually talking about James' health.)
Page 31: '"Her father wants her home but he can't manage yet."' (Charlotte is confused because she thinks her grandmother is talking about her father's job as a shop manager, but she is actually talking about her father's ability to look after Charlotte during the crisis.)
Question b) Do you think Charlotte's family are right not to tell her the baby has died?
Nearly half the trial students believed Charlotte's family was right, nearly half believed they were wrong, and a small group thought they were both right and wrong.
Developing justification of response without elaboration
Following is an example of a response that reflects an awareness of the need to justify responses, but does not reflect an awareness of the need to include elaboration when justifying a response. We found a useful example from a student who thought Charlotte's family were right.
I think yes because she is young and she might cry.
Awareness of the need to include elaboration
Following are examples of responses that reflect an awareness that responses need to include elaboration; responses are sometimes stated a little emphatically. We found useful examples from students who thought Charlotte's family were wrong.
I say no because I have a little brother and I would want to know he died because although it may be sudden and more of a shock it would be better for her parents and her just to get it over and done with rather than holding the suspense;
Charlotte's family should have told her from the start because she should know when somebody died in your family, not just keep it to themselves.
We found a useful example from a student who thought Charlotte's family were right and wrong.
Yes they should tell her because she has a right to know - she's a part of the family. And no because she might not understand, she will get really sad, and probably have nightmares.
Reflects an awareness of the complexity of events
Following is an example of a response that reflects an awareness of the complexity of events in the story, including the perspective of the adults.We found a useful example from a student who thought Charlotte's family were right.
Yes I think they were right not to tell Charlotte. I think they just needed some time ... they had to figure things out before they told her.
Question c) Has the author made Charlotte a believable character? Is she realistic?
Almost all the trial students thought Charlotte was a believable character. A very small group thought she wasn't, and a very small group thought she was and she wasn't.
Stating belief, closely connected to personal experience
Following are examples of responses that reflect an awareness of how to state a belief, but those responses may be very reliant on personal experience and/or they may reflect a reluctance to "suspend disbelief" and temporarily accept the story on the page as "reality". We found a useful example from a student who thought Charlotte was a believable character.
Yes because in my life my mum was pregnant and lost her baby too and like Charlotte every Friday I went to my nana's house, so in my life she is a believable character.
We found a useful example from a student who thought Charlotte wasn't a believable character:
No because when her dad told her about James she never cried.
We found a useful example from a student who thought Charlotte was and wasn't a believable character:
Yes and no because Charlotte is a believable name but it sounds a bit fake as most stories do.
Understanding of character motivations
Following are examples of responses that reflect an understanding of how someone in Charlotte's situation would feel and behave. We found useful examples from students who thought Charlotte was a believable character:
I think yes because she has real emotion and does what a normal girl would do
A lot of mums have lost a baby and like Charlotte a lot of kids never know what happened until later
They have made Charlotte realistic because her feelings are like a real person's feelings
Yes because that can happen to a lot of people and maybe it happened to the author's family
She acts like a normal little kid would. She doesn't really understand what's happening in the story.
Awareness of authors characterisation
Following is an example that reflects an awareness of how authors construct believable characters through the use of carefully chosen specific details. In this case we are told Charlotte "acts" like normal girl; we are then given examples of her actions - using a brush, smelling the smelling salts, and asking for her dad.
We found a useful example from a student who believed Charlotte was a believable character.She's realistic because she acts like a normal girl. For example on page 30 she was using the brush, smelling the boxes, and asking for her dad.
2Our trial data has enabled us to begin to describe performance at this curriculum level and the student responses give us exemplars of performance. The New Zealand Curriculum (2007) and The Literacy Learning Progressions (2010) were closely consulted throughout consideration of learning ideas from the curriculum.
The following section: Students who need to focus on using text details, is presented as an example of how you might foreground the Key Competencies within reading. In particular, it exemplifies how you might foreground "Using language, symbols, and texts" and, to a lesser extent, "Thinking" within reading through a focus on the way authors construct characters with carefully chosen details. This approach requires students to not just understand the text but to understand how the text is constructed and why it is constructed that way. This idea is expanded below. In the table below, Using language, symbols, and texts has the largest bolded font because it is the most important to this particular example.
Students who need to focus on using text details
Writers build characters with details. Good writers are meticulous in their choice of details, including only those that add value and meaning to the description of a character. It is these details, as well as background knowledge, that a reader uses in order to respond to questions such as "What things do the adults say that Charlotte misunderstands?, "Do you think Charlotte's family are right not to tell her the baby has died?", and "Has the author made Charlotte a believable character Is she realistic?"
Details: telling and showing
Writers may choose to use details that tell readers about characters if they want to convey information quickly. For example:
Charlotte was pleased about the baby being a boy. (p.29)
However by telling the reader that Charlotte is pleased, the writer has not given the reader the opportunity to come to their own conclusion about how she might be feeling; and, increasingly, modern readers expect to have that opportunity. More commonly, writers of fiction will choose to use details that show characters to readers. For example:
Charlotte heard her uncle's voice and his boots clumping on the floor. She quickly replaced the bottle. (p.30)
Here the reader must infer why Charlotte quickly replaces the bottle: Perhaps she is excited that her uncle has arrived? Perhaps she doesn't want to get caught doing something she knows she shouldn't do? Ask your students to compare how they respond to having the opportunity to come to their own conclusion about why Charlotte quickly replaces the bottle with how they would respond if the author had simply told them "Charlotte quickly replaced the bottle because she knew she wasn't supposed to touch Grandma's things."
Details: general and specific
When writers tell readers about characters they use details that are general or broad. For example, the narrator says:
Charlotte was pleased about the baby being a boy. (p.29)
The word "pleased" is general (or abstract); it has a broad rather than specific meaning because it can be generally applied to all sorts of situations. You might like to ask your students to tell you about the situations "pleased" can be applied to in an attempt to show them that it is not specific to any particular situation. (Note that at this point your students will probably be unclear about why "pleased" is general; in fact they may even argue that it has a specific meaning. It will probably not be until the end of the following exercise that they have a clearer understanding.)
Reaching to the back, just under the mirror, she picked up the bottle of green smelling salts. She pulled out the stopper and gently sniffed. The ammonia made her eyes run. (p.30)
Here readers create an image that is specific. They create a vivid picture in their heads; they can "see" this image. Most importantly, it is vivid pictures like this one that have impact upon readers. Finally, ask your students to attempt to create a picture in their heads of someone who is "pleased" (you may need to explain at some point that it is much easier when they imagine a specific situation).
Note: According to Burroway and Stuckey-French (2007: 81-82), "our eyes are our most highly developed means of perception...it is appearance that prompts our first reaction to people". A character's appearance, their clothing, features, shape, style, the way they hold themselves and objects associated with them such as the car they drive or the house they live in, make statements about who the character is, what kind of person they are, their character, the "inner" person.
For more information on the terms "abstract" and "concrete":http://www.nzcermarking.org.nz/help/AbstractInformation.html
References
Burroway, J. and Stuckey-French, E. (2007). Writing Fiction: A guide to narrative craft. Seventh Edition. New York, NY: Longman.
Ministry of Education, (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education (2010). The literacy learning progressions: Meeting the reading and writing demands of the curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.